Skip to content

Page control arrows for PWA

Solved Customisation
  • hi @phenomlab , when the forum is used as PWA, there is no easy way to navigate between pages…

    Several days ago, I was reading a post on a forum that mentioned another topic, I have encountered an issue when attempting to return to the original post. So, after reading the linked topic, I had to go to categories page and retrace my steps to locate the topic I was reading initially…

    Although this can be achieved by page control arrows on destop and mobile browsers, there is no easy way to achieve this on PWA… so I wonder if you can help me adding some page control buttons that appear at the bottom of the page when scrolled up. (maybe it can be integrated to post navigation bar but I believe those buttons should appear in all pages, not only in topics)

    Here is just some suggestions to distinguish them from other arrows…

    alt text

    alternatively the arrows or rewind icons that YouTube uses can be used:

    alt text

  • crazycellsundefined crazycells referenced this topic on
  • @crazycells Right - I’ve put together a base design on this site which will only fire when PWA mode is detected. It looks like the below - note the left and right arrows. They are “basic” but functional 🙂

    ba4e6203-55d8-4462-82d7-cba35ad530da-image.png

    CSS

    /* START - CSS settings for PWA navigation */
        
    .arrow {
      width: 40px;
      height: 40px;
      background-color: var(--bs-body-bg);
      text-align: center;
      line-height: 30px;
      cursor: pointer;
      font-size: 30px;
      border: 1px solid var(--bs-border-color);
      border-radius: var(--bs-border-radius);
    }
    .arrow.left, .arrow.right {
        margin-left: 10px;
        margin-right: 10px;
        align-content: center;
        position: fixed;
        top: 50%;
    }
    .arrow.right {
        position: fixed;
        right: 0;
    }
    
    /* END - CSS settings for PWA navigation */
    

    JS

    The below code does rely on serviceWorker but that’s typically present in all “modern” browsers

    $(document).ready(function() {
      // Check if serviceWorker API is available
      if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
        // The browser supports service workers
        console.log('This web app supports service workers.');
    
        // Check if the app is installed (as PWA)
        if (window.matchMedia('(display-mode: standalone)').matches) {
          console.log('This web app is running as a Progressive Web App.');
          
          // Add HTML for navigation arrows
          $('body').append('<div class="navigation"><div class="arrow left">&lt;</div><div class="arrow right">&gt;</div></div>');
    
          // Handle click on left arrow
          $('.arrow.left').click(function() {
            history.back(); // Go back in history
          });
    
          // Handle click on right arrow
          $('.arrow.right').click(function() {
            history.forward(); // Go forward in history
          });
        } else {
          console.log('This web app is not running as a Progressive Web App.');
        }
      } else {
        console.log('This web browser does not support service workers.');
      }
    });
    

    Again, this is basic and more of a POC. Other functionality can be added in a similar way if you’d like it.

  • @crazycells haven’t forgotten. Working on this now and expect to have a usable POC you can try in the coming days.

  • @phenomlab no problem at all, nothing is urgent 🙂 please take your time and I really appreciate your help…

  • @crazycells Right - I’ve put together a base design on this site which will only fire when PWA mode is detected. It looks like the below - note the left and right arrows. They are “basic” but functional 🙂

    ba4e6203-55d8-4462-82d7-cba35ad530da-image.png

    CSS

    /* START - CSS settings for PWA navigation */
        
    .arrow {
      width: 40px;
      height: 40px;
      background-color: var(--bs-body-bg);
      text-align: center;
      line-height: 30px;
      cursor: pointer;
      font-size: 30px;
      border: 1px solid var(--bs-border-color);
      border-radius: var(--bs-border-radius);
    }
    .arrow.left, .arrow.right {
        margin-left: 10px;
        margin-right: 10px;
        align-content: center;
        position: fixed;
        top: 50%;
    }
    .arrow.right {
        position: fixed;
        right: 0;
    }
    
    /* END - CSS settings for PWA navigation */
    

    JS

    The below code does rely on serviceWorker but that’s typically present in all “modern” browsers

    $(document).ready(function() {
      // Check if serviceWorker API is available
      if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
        // The browser supports service workers
        console.log('This web app supports service workers.');
    
        // Check if the app is installed (as PWA)
        if (window.matchMedia('(display-mode: standalone)').matches) {
          console.log('This web app is running as a Progressive Web App.');
          
          // Add HTML for navigation arrows
          $('body').append('<div class="navigation"><div class="arrow left">&lt;</div><div class="arrow right">&gt;</div></div>');
    
          // Handle click on left arrow
          $('.arrow.left').click(function() {
            history.back(); // Go back in history
          });
    
          // Handle click on right arrow
          $('.arrow.right').click(function() {
            history.forward(); // Go forward in history
          });
        } else {
          console.log('This web app is not running as a Progressive Web App.');
        }
      } else {
        console.log('This web browser does not support service workers.');
      }
    });
    

    Again, this is basic and more of a POC. Other functionality can be added in a similar way if you’d like it.

  • phenomlabundefined phenomlab has marked this topic as solved
  • @phenomlab thank you very much 🙏

  • @crazycells what would be the z-index value to hide it when the navigation menu options appear? I believe they should be invisible when those options panels are opened…

  • @crazycells yeah, I set that quite high at 9999 which is complete overkill! Try lowering that value to something more sane like 1500

  • @crazycells I think I found a bug. If you position a topic between the two navigation arrows on a mobile device, you cannot click that topic until you scroll up or down past the arrows. I noticed this last night and will address it.

  • A better explanation of that is below

    image.png

    As you can see from the developer view, the width: 100%; sits over the top of the topic meaning it cannot be clicked or tapped. A workaround here should be to set z-index: -1; on the navigation class, but whilst that resolves the ordering issue, it means the navigation buttons no longer work as they sit under the content.

  • Fixed. Change the CSS block (original post is also updated) to the below

    /* START - CSS settings for PWA navigation */
        
    .arrow {
      width: 40px;
      height: 40px;
      background-color: var(--bs-body-bg);
      text-align: center;
      line-height: 30px;
      cursor: pointer;
      font-size: 30px;
      border: 1px solid var(--bs-border-color);
      border-radius: var(--bs-border-radius);
    }
    .arrow.left, .arrow.right {
        margin-left: 10px;
        margin-right: 10px;
        align-content: center;
        position: fixed;
        top: 50%;
    }
    .arrow.right {
        position: fixed;
        right: 0;
    }
    
    /* END - CSS settings for PWA navigation */
    
  • I have not tested them in details yet, but I will let you know about any bugs for sure 👍🏼

    Additionally, is there any reason that they are in the middle but not close to the bottom? That is usually where the fingers will be

  • @crazycells They can be anywhere you’d prefer. You can just change the .arrow.left, .arrow.right class to move to the preferred position. Currently, it’s set at 50%, but can be any value you want to reach the desired position. In this case, it would probably be better to substitute top for bottom and set the position in px to ensure the placement is the same no matter which screen estate you have.

    For example

    .arrow.left, .arrow.right {
        margin-left: 10px;
        margin-right: 10px;
        align-content: center;
        position: fixed;
        bottom: 120px;
    }
    

    That now means the page scroller (the button that appears bottom right) will be in the way, although on thinking about it, we already have a page navigation when you are in the topic, so no point in having another. That would be a minor alteration to the scroll top function to have it not appear on posts.

  • @phenomlab thanks, yes, I will move them close to the menu bar, but I was asking in case there is a technical detail I was not aware…

  • @crazycells No, none that I am aware of - move them to where you’d prefer. In fact, I took your advice and moved them on Sudonix, which uses the CSS class I added in the previous post.

  • @phenomlab yes, I believe this looks more natural, they are closer to the fingers and on the top of these, it is not blocking any content in the middle of the screen…

  • @crazycells Exactly. i’m going to hire you as a design guru! You have some great ideas on what Sudonix should look like and I’m grateful for any contribution that enhances what I hope is already a good experience.

  • @phenomlab It is nice to hear that I am able to contribute your website 😄

  • @phenomlab said in Page control arrows for PWA:

    That now means the page scroller (the button that appears bottom right) will be in the way, although on thinking about it, we already have a page navigation when you are in the topic, so no point in having another.

    Based on the above point made, I have now disabled the scroll to top button inside topics.

  • @phenomlab this works great! thanks a lot. And thanks to your JS codes, it is only activated on PWA, not on mobile…


Did this solution help you?
Did you find the suggested solution useful? Why not buy me a coffee? It's a nice gesture, and a great way to show your appreciation 💗

  • Bug Report

    Solved Bugs
    43
    21 Votes
    43 Posts
    866 Views

    @crazycells yep. I get it! Good point.

  • Nodebb icon on google page

    Solved Customisation
    9
    4 Votes
    9 Posts
    597 Views

    @Panda It’s been raised multiple times, but only for the open source version, and not hosted.

  • 3 Votes
    5 Posts
    502 Views

    @DownPW it’s possible, yes, but you may inadvertently end up targeting other elements using the same class which of course isn’t desired.

    Can you provide a link in DM for me to review?

  • Nodebb design

    Solved General
    2
    1 Votes
    2 Posts
    146 Views

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    One negative is not being so good for SEO as more Server side rendered forums, if web crawlers dont run the JS to read the forum.

    From recollection, Google and Bing have the capability to read and process JS, although it’s not in the same manner as a physical person will consume content on a page. It will be seen as plain text, but will be indexed. However, it’s important to note that Yandex and Baidu will not render JS, although seeing as Google has a 90% share of the content available on the web in terms of indexing, this isn’t something you’ll likely lose sleep over.

    @Panda said in Nodebb design:

    The “write api” is preferred for server-to-server interactions.

    This is mostly based around overall security - you won’t typically want a client machine changing database elements or altering data. This is why you have “client-side” which could be DOM manipulation etc, and “server-side” which performs more complex operations as it can communicate directly with the database whereas the client cannot (and if it can, then you have a serious security flaw). Reading from the API is perfectly acceptable on the client-side, but not being able to write.

    A paradigm here would be something like SNMP. This protocol exists as a UDP (UDP is very efficient, as it is “fire and forget” and does not wait for a response like TCP does) based service which reads performance data from a remote source, thus enabling an application to parse that data for use in a monitoring application. In all cases, SNMP access should be “RO” (Read Only) and not RW (Read Write). It is completely feasible to assume complete control over a firewall for example by having RW access to SNMP and then exposing it to the entire internet with a weak passphrase.

    You wouldn’t do it (at least, I hope you wouldn’t) and the same ethic applies to server-side rendering and the execution of commands.

  • 4 Votes
    11 Posts
    333 Views

    @DownPW I’d have to agree with that.

  • Email validation NodeBB

    Bugs
    21
    3 Votes
    21 Posts
    879 Views

    @Panda said in Email validation NodeBB:

    Did you configure that as a custom change to the usual quote icon. How do you do that?
    I notice on NodeBB site its a solid blue quotes

    Yes, I changed it. NodeBB by default users the free font awesome library whereas I use the pro (paid) version SDK have access to a wider set of icons, and at different thicknesses etc. The change of colour is just simple CSS.

  • 2 Votes
    20 Posts
    632 Views

    @phenomlab

    grrrrrrr
    grrrrr

    that simple…

    Thanks Mark

  • fading in /tags page

    Solved Customisation
    32
    30 Votes
    32 Posts
    3k Views

    Fix working perfectly 👍 🙂